We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities."
"What I like best about vCenter Orchestrator is that it makes life easier through automation. People can request to automate all processes with vCenter Orchestrator, such as adding storage, creating VMs, removing VMs, and extending VMs."
"The solution is stable."
"In regards to the workflows, the fact that we can actually have a full dashboard library of all the existing workflows on this is great. We can see all the workflows and what all the actions do and can work with scripts."
"The solution's ability to template and easily implement are the most valuable features. It offers good replication as well."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is complete, and you don't need any add-ons."
"User-friendly and easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature for us is the performance stability of vCenter Orchestrator, especially in complex situations, making it excellent for managing virtual machines."
"The product's integration is good, it works well with other programs and solutions."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"It is practically difficult at this stage to really comment on the improvisations of V central. But more tech events and PoC cases would help the EA to design better solutions and utilization."
"The price of this product is high and could be improved."
"This solution needs to have more built-in workflows."
"The GUI should be enhanced in the future."
"Mainly VMware integrates with other products, but there is no easy way to link with other products from a different vendor. We can integrate with other products from the same vendors fairly well, but if they could make it so integration is easier with other vendors, that would really help."
"In the next release, to make it easier to write the workflows, I would l like to see more HTML GUIs."
"A feature to review and setup tasks should be added."
"I would like to see, from within the Web Console, being able to define the project and custom templates per user; almost like how CloudSpec has approached the solution."
Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Pega BPM vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
