Anonymous UserSenior Consultant at a aerospace/defense firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the workflow creation."
"The most valuable feature is that it's simple and very ergonomic to use the product compared to other virtualizing product. Out of Microsoft, Red Hat, and IBM, we found VMware to be the best one."
"Communication with technical support is very good. It has a repository of knowledge base articles which we can access which are very helpful."
"In regards to the workflows, the fact that we can actually have a full dashboard library of all the existing workflows on this is great. We can see all the workflows and what all the actions do and can work with scripts."
"It's 100% stable, it's always stable. We haven't had any bugs. The solution works very well and we haven't had any problems."
"vCenter Orchestrator is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is complete, and you don't need any add-ons."
"The solution's ability to template and easily implement are the most valuable features. It offers good replication as well."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"The custom workflows are very difficult and confusing."
"It is too expensive. One of the main issues is the price."
"Mainly VMware integrates with other products, but there is no easy way to link with other products from a different vendor. We can integrate with other products from the same vendors fairly well, but if they could make it so integration is easier with other vendors, that would really help."
"As we work towards more stability on the solution, sometimes we'll try something and it breaks and it's easier to restart the service. That's the only drawback. We've experienced this with other applications as well."
"Storage has room for improvement. It's a big problem for our solution. The interface also needs improvement, it should be simplified."
"The interface could be improved to bring greater user-friendliness and ease of use."
"In the next release, to make it easier to write the workflows, I would l like to see more HTML GUIs."
"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."
"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors."
"The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products."
"It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases."
"It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow."
"The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair."
"We mostly have a yearly license."
"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."
"This solution is expensive and the licensing is more attractive for Haveri."
"The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 16 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 7th in Process Automation with 14 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.4, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Simple, ergonomic, and easy to use in a complex environment ". Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda Platform, ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft PowerApps, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), vCloud Director, Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and Cisco UCS Director. See our Pega BPM vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.