Compare Pega BPM vs. WebRatio
Sponsored
 | Abdurrahman Gori Technical Manager at a comms service provider |
 | Andrzej Chmielarski Tech lead/Solution architect/Team manager at a tech services company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"It has an open BPM"
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
Cons
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors."
"The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products."
"It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases."
"It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow."
"The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair."
"We mostly have a yearly license."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with… more »
Top Answer: The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.
Top Answer: The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.
Top Answer: The initial setup isn't too complex.
Top Answer: The maintenance aspect is too heavy. Moving from one version to the other made the solution change, and not in a way… more »
Top Answer: My experience is related to doing analysis specifically on WebRatio. I make some analysis and evaluate it. I do not use… more »
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Camunda BPM
Pegasystems, SmartBPM
Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.
With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
In WebRatio we have been nurturing a true passion for developing enterprise-class software that exponentially increases the productivity and agility of our customers.
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Pega BPM
Learn more about WebRatio
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement
Unicredit Leasing, Acer, Gruppo Torinese Transporti, A2A, SET Distribuzone, Dolomiti Energia, AIM Gruppo, IFC CNA_ Amsa
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm37%
Computer Software Company32%
Real Estate/Law Firm11%
Retailer5%
Computer Software Company36%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider13%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise27%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise56%
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise75%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management with 16 reviews while WebRatio is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.4, while WebRatio is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebRatio writes "Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM, Microsoft PowerApps and OutSystems, whereas WebRatio is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.