We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"The case management is great."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow. Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Pega BPM vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Process Automation vendors, and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
