Compare Pega Robotic Process Automation vs. ProcessRobot by Softomotive
 |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"The most valuable feature of Pega Robotic Process Automation is the technique: you can create a user interface that can interact with a human being for attended robots." "The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data." "The solution's ability to create adapters quickly is its most valuable feature." "The most valuable aspect for myself was access to the .net framework. If I couldn't figure something out using the objects that they had provided, I could bring in the .net objects and do so using similar logic that I would in a .net or C sharp coding language. Having that familiarity was helpful." "Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow." "Using the tool actually ends up teaching you about making workflows more efficient." "The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available." "It is really flexible in what it can do." | "The development time for ProcessRobot is very good compared to other solutions." "The most valuable features of this solution are the cost and ease of use, it's very simple." "The interface is user-friendly." |
Cons | |
"Pega Robotic Process Automation can improve the OGR area. You don't have a feature to read documents in computer voices." "You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data." "The OCR capabilities of the solution could be improved." "Pega has a no-code low-code environment. We do everything based on established rules. You kind-of have to learn how all their rules work and how it works for robotics before you can use the solution effectively." "I have faced many scenarios in the business workflow, where a few applications run on the Citrix environment. That could be a critical part of the process without which business won't be able to accept the automation solution. Because of one small bottleneck, you will lose a very good candidate for process automation." "The ease-of-use could be improved." "I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included." | "Better support is needed for building custom components on top of ProcessRobot." "They need to come up with a little more on AI and precision discovery path to be able to record the processes." "We are looking to see more features implemented there are already available in UiPath or Automation Anywhere." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "There is flexibility in pricing." "This is a cost-effective product and now that it has been acquired by Microsoft, we don't expect the cost to increase with the next release." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs. 456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: The solution's ability to create adapters quickly is its most valuable feature. Top Answer: We haven't paid for anything above the standard licensing fee. Top Answer: The OCR capabilities of the solution could be improved. The ability to call different website services from the server would be helpful. The solution should offer integration with applications in… more » | Top Answer: The development time for ProcessRobot is very good compared to other solutions. Top Answer: There are some limitations when it comes to automation with Excel. Better support is needed for building custom components on top of ProcessRobot. Top Answer: We are implementation service providers and this is one of the products that we provide to our clients. There are several use cases for this solution including automating tender processes… more » |
Ranking  | |
Views 7,190 Comparisons 5,193 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 655 Rating 7.7 | Views 2,088 Comparisons 1,435 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 575 Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 35% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 39% of the time. Compared 38% of the time. Compared 12% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Pega RPA, OpenSpan | Softomotive ProcessRobot, ProcessRobot |
Learn | |
| Pega | Microsoft |
Overview | |
With Pega Robotic Process Automation (RPA), organizations can automate the mundane, tedious, time-consuming, manual work that is hampering productivity and efficiency. Whether adjudicating claims, onboarding customers or employees, reconciling financials, updating customer information in systems record, Pega RPA can manage the work across your enterprise. | ProcessRobot is a leading enterprise RPA platform, including enterprise-grade security and controls, with links to best-of-breed AI technologies. Request a live demo https://www.softomotive.com/pr... About Softomotive Softomotive is one of the leading worldwide providers of Robotic Process Automation solutions, trusted by more than 8,000 companies worldwide. Softomotive provides the smoothest RPA journey by allowing you to start small, learn quickly and scale seamlessly. This helps to reduce overall project risk and avoids high up-front costs which can make achieving a positive ROI that much harder. Softomotive recognises that when it comes to automation one size does not fit all. We are the only provider of process automation technology to offer a portfolio of solutions designed to meet the diverse needs of individuals, small teams, growth companies, and large enterprises. Both attended and unattended process automation solutions, which share the same underlying automation engine for a seamless transition, are delivered through powerful, robust RPA technology. These range from a standalone desktop solution to a server-based, distributed Enterprise RPA platform, both of which are quick to deploy and provide the best value for money |
Offer | |
Learn more about Pega Robotic Process Automation | Learn more about ProcessRobot by Softomotive |
Sample Customers | |
| eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank | Xerox, IBM, Diageo, PWC, JP Morgan, Coloplast, Reventics |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company40% Comms Service Provider12% Financial Services Firm11% Insurance Company5% | Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider25% Retailer5% Outsourcing Company5% |
Company Size | |
Small Business22% Midsize Enterprise11% Large Enterprise67% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega Robotic Process Automation vs. ProcessRobot by Softomotive and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 10th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews while ProcessRobot by Softomotive is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews. Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6, while ProcessRobot by Softomotive is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "A very flexible solution with broad capabilities that gets easy to use with time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessRobot by Softomotive writes "Process automation that is easy to use and the pricing is flexible". Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Salesforce Sales Cloud and Microsoft Power Automate, whereas ProcessRobot by Softomotive is most compared with WinAutomation by Softomotive, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and ABBYY FlexiCapture. See our Pega Robotic Process Automation vs. ProcessRobot by Softomotive report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.