Compare Pentera vs. Verodin

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pentera Logo
718 views|551 comparisons
Verodin Logo
2,067 views|1,388 comparisons
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge.
Top Answer: I wasn't involved at the very end when it came to the discussion of pricing. At the time of the pricing of the solution, it's my understanding that the pricing model that they had for this solution… more »
Top Answer: The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it… more »
Ranking
Views
718
Comparisons
551
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,067
Comparisons
1,388
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,204
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Learn More
Overview

Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to test with ease the integrity of all cybersecurity layers, unfolding true, current security exposures at any moment, at any scale. Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io.

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Offer
Learn more about Pentera
Learn more about Verodin
Sample Customers
Blackstone Group
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm10%
Healthcare Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government7%

Pentera is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review. Pentera is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, XM Cyber HaXM, AttackIQ, SafeBreach and Picus Security, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach and Picus Security.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.