Anonymous UserCyber Security Consultant at a tech consulting company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Earn 20 points
Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to test with ease the integrity of all cybersecurity layers, unfolding true, current security exposures at any moment, at any scale. Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io.
Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.
Pentera is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review. Pentera is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, XM Cyber HaXM, AttackIQ, SafeBreach and Picus Security, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach and Picus Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.