Compare PeopleFluent Talent Management vs. Workday

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: April 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."

More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pros »

"We have fewer systems, less manual data entry, and less processing.""Performance and good usability are the two most valuable features of this solution.""The solution is extremely stable.""It's actually a cloud-native solution and based on the community for development. It is a very good open architecture and able to interconnect with other systems. And it is very stable and very fast in terms of response.""This product is leaps and bounds above the competition. Part of the reason is that it is built with modern technology. It has no legacy coding in it at all.""The user interface is good and very easy to use.""The platform itself is very robust and I generally like the reporting and analytics capability.""It's intuitive, a very usable tool and it's easy to find the data you're looking for."

More Workday Pros »

Cons
"The integration capabilities could be improved."

More PeopleFluent Talent Management Cons »

"There is a lot of complexity in the configuration of this solution.""It has missing functionalities. Specific countries, like Germany, didn't have the option to do payroll. Now we need to look for another product for HR.""Setting up reports can be a bit tricky.""Reporting systems should be improved. If you want to report it on paper, if you want something more BI oriented, more high level predictive or more data-driven, it should be improved.""It is good that much of the development is based on community input but often that can lead to details being ignored and small, nagging issues are ignored.""The security console should be made less complex.""The UI, UX (user experience) is very bad. It is not very interactive.""It's possible that the way things are integrated could be improved"

More Workday Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's not too expensive, but not too cheap either."

More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Workday is an expensive solution.""You have the license fee per module, and then you have a kind of annual training fee, which is a kind of add-on. I wouldn't say it is exhaustive; it is minor. Licensing is pretty transparent for most of the part.""The pricing is good from an HR perspective, although management gets upset after spending $500,000 a year, every year.""Its price is pretty high. It is more expensive than what is offered by other competitors in the market."

More Workday Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great.
Top Answer: I'm not involved in the pricing, so I don't have a clue how it works. I believe from previous projects, where I encountered the PeopleFluent Dimension series solution, it's somewhere midterm — it's in… more »
Top Answer: The integration capabilities could be improved. Integration of the recently acquired Learning Management System into the PeopleFluent suite, since it's clear that it's just recently acquired and it's… more »
Top Answer: Differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud,w and SAP SuccessFactors:w Oracle: "simple interface and deep customization to suit the purpose." SAP: Multiple functionalities that increase process… more »
Top Answer: The reporting feature is quite easy for a layman to use, and the look and feel of the application is good. Its security is robust. You will never find a use case that cannot be covered.
Top Answer: Its price is pretty high. It is more expensive than what is offered by other competitors in the market.
Ranking
12th
out of 53 in Talent Management
Views
462
Comparisons
394
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,180
Rating
8.0
1st
out of 53 in Talent Management
Views
14,471
Comparisons
10,080
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
686
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Peopleclick Authoria, PeopleFluent
Learn More
Overview

PeopleFluent provides total Talent Management software and services that gives HR professionals innovative, collaborative technology. PeopleFluent 's comprehensive and unified best-of-breed talent management suite delivers a fully integrated solution which includes recruiting or talent acquisition, performance, compensation, workforce compliance, learning management, succession planning, vendor management, diversity, workforce planning and analytics. PeopleFluent's total talent management solutions offer a unique combination of best-of-breed mobile and cloud-based suite solutions, spanning the acquisition and management of your hourly, salaried, and contingent workers. By aggregating the data accumulated for each type of worker, our solutions provide the predictive information needed by HR and business executives to drive key talent decisions. PeopleFluent delivers innovative and comprehensive Talent Management solutions with built-in business value to enable business objectives.

Workday's enterprise Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) products are cost-effective alternative to ERP software systems for human resource management. Watch our product previews and learn how Workday on-demand business intelligence applications can help organize, evaluate and maximize your profits today!
Offer
Learn more about PeopleFluent Talent Management
Learn more about Workday
Sample Customers
Hertz Video, UAP, ServiceMaster, Advance Auto Parts, Nationwide Insurance, Exelon, WakeMed, Biopharmaceutical Company VMS, Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Hammersmith & Fulham, FitchRatings, Fitness First, Carillion, Carquest, AccentCare VMS, Cadbury Schweppes
AAA, Allied Global, Avago Technologies Limited, Aviva, Cardinal Health, CareFusion, Chiquita Brands International, Equifax, Flextronics, HP, Life Time Fitness, McKee Foods, MGM Resorts International, Sanofi, ServiceSource International, Symantec, TripAdvisor, Yahoo!
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer7%
Educational Organization6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company8%
Transportation Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: April 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PeopleFluent Talent Management is ranked 12th in Talent Management with 1 review while Workday is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 12 reviews. PeopleFluent Talent Management is rated 8.0, while Workday is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PeopleFluent Talent Management writes "A flexible solution with superb automation capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workday writes "Simple to use with easy report creation and excellent AI". PeopleFluent Talent Management is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Taleo and SAP HCM, whereas Workday is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, PeopleSoft, Oracle Taleo and Ceridian Dayforce HCM.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.