Compare PeopleSoft vs. QAD Enterprise Applications
 | Daniel Ou Vice President at Singapore Post Ltd | Group Technology - eCommerce Logistics |
Use QAD Enterprise Applications? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, NetSuite, IFS and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It's approximately $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 USD per year."
"The licensing cost for PeopleSoft is 3,500 per course and the annual subscription fee is 6,500."
"I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspending licenses."
"There are no additional costs for licensing."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Activity Based Costing Software solutions are best for your needs.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
10,356
Comparisons
8,646
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
480
Rating
7.8
Views
169
Comparisons
128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.
QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Learn more about QAD Enterprise Applications
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford ChildrenĀs Health
Vitatech
University12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government9%
Local Government9%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company5%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise62%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, NetSuite, IFS and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: February 2021.
463,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeopleSoft is ranked 2nd in Activity Based Costing Software with 13 reviews while QAD Enterprise Applications is ranked 12th in Activity Based Costing Software. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while QAD Enterprise Applications is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "User-friendly and performs well but views should be simplified to one page". On the other hand, PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday and Oracle ERP Cloud, whereas QAD Enterprise Applications is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best Demand Management vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.