Compare PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PeopleSoft Logo
10,523 views|8,766 comparisons
SAP ERP Logo
14,956 views|13,244 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution.""The solution's scalability is good.""Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market.""The new version of this solution is very scalable.""The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements.""PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus.""In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do.""The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."

More PeopleSoft Pros »

"SAP has provided a much more integrated platform for managing our manufacturing business.""This is a robust and feature-rich solution.""The architecture of the solution overall is great. It's great for development, testing, and production. I've worked with solutions where the architecture wasn't as strong and it was a disaster.""The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules.""The most valuable features are that it's very customizable and it's flexible.""It is the best solution in the class of ERP products.""It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning.""The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect."

More SAP ERP Pros »

Cons
"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment.""The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this.""If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive.""There could be more adaptability of the system.""Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors.""It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports.""I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it.""Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."

More PeopleSoft Cons »

"This solution could be made more user-friendly for development teams.""The user interface needs to be improved.""The system is very big. It is not exactly user-friendly, due to the fact that it's so massive and complex.""The version that we are using lacks in reporting. The reporting feature needs to be constructed more in this product. There can be better scope for mobility. They could include the technical development of reports instead of depending completely on programming. The programming method needs to be easy.""SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet.""The product does not update budgeting based on exchange rates which is important for BPM.""It is very expensive to customize to meet compliance with regulations in some countries.""The solution is quite expensive. They need to work on the pricing to make it more reasonable."

More SAP ERP Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's approximately $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 USD per year.""The licensing cost for PeopleSoft is 3,500 per course and the annual subscription fee is 6,500.""I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspending licenses.""There are no additional costs for licensing."

More PeopleSoft Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is a costly product.""There are licensing costs.""Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have.""The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive.""SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud.""SAP ERP is expensive."

More SAP ERP Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: A solid and mature product.
Top Answer: There are no additional costs for licensing.
Top Answer: I think PeopleSoft should focus on enhancing the tools and the UI, and making it a more updated app as opposed to the old, tiny, older look and feel. That's where they should put their efforts.
Top Answer: The solution is very mature.
Top Answer: Overall, the solution isn't lacking any features. What the company can get out of the solutions very much dependant on the users. They need to be knowledgeable about the product. The user interface… more »
Top Answer: We are using the solutions from anchoring to sketching all the business processes and documentation. It can be used in everything from manufacturing to finance or even marketing. Every process you can… more »
Ranking
3rd
out of 54 in ERP
Views
10,523
Comparisons
8,766
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
7.7
1st
out of 54 in ERP
Views
14,956
Comparisons
13,244
Reviews
24
Average Words per Review
394
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.
SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.
Offer
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Learn more about SAP ERP
Sample Customers
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government9%
Local Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company27%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider22%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in ERP with 11 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 24 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 7.8, while SAP ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "User-friendly and performs well but views should be simplified to one page". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "This is the best solution of this kind but has weakness in budget planning for certain user groups". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle E-Business Suite and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with Anaplan, IFS Applications, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP Business One and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.