Compare PeopleSoft vs. UKG

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PeopleSoft Logo
10,523 views|8,766 comparisons
UKG Logo
Read 1 UKG review.
3,872 views|2,356 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: April 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution.""The solution's scalability is good.""Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market.""The new version of this solution is very scalable.""The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements.""PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus.""In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do.""The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."

More PeopleSoft Pros »

"The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years."

More UKG Pros »

Cons
"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment.""The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this.""If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive.""There could be more adaptability of the system.""Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors.""It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports.""I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it.""Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."

More PeopleSoft Cons »

"The solution could use better reporting with standard reports. We use the Cognos platform in BI for a lot of our reporting. However, they need to have more robust standard reporting available to their user base."

More UKG Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's approximately $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 USD per year.""The licensing cost for PeopleSoft is 3,500 per course and the annual subscription fee is 6,500.""I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspending licenses.""There are no additional costs for licensing."

More PeopleSoft Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: A solid and mature product.
Top Answer: There are no additional costs for licensing.
Top Answer: I think PeopleSoft should focus on enhancing the tools and the UI, and making it a more updated app as opposed to the old, tiny, older look and feel. That's where they should put their efforts.
Top Answer: The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years.
Top Answer: There are some improvements needed as it's still a growing technology. Improvements with regard to some of its functionality need to be extended out a little bit further. The solution could use better… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for payroll, HR, recruiting, and onboarding.
Ranking
3rd
Views
10,523
Comparisons
8,766
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
7.7
7th
Views
3,872
Comparisons
2,356
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
744
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready
Learn More
Overview
Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.

At UKG, our purpose is people — real people with real challenges, and a simple request. Help me keep my employees productive, connected, and happy. So that’s what we did.

We’ve created an unmatched suite of HR and workforce management solutions, backed by our people who care about yours. Our solutions deliver global workforce experiences that truly reflect the connection between life and work today. That means insights are deeper. Work is easier. And interactions are more meaningful. 

Offer
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Learn more about UKG
Sample Customers
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm11%
University11%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company15%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company7%
Construction Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise46%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: April 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in Benefits Administration with 12 reviews while UKG is ranked 7th in Benefits Administration with 1 review. PeopleSoft is rated 7.6, while UKG is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "User-friendly and performs well but views should be simplified to one page". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UKG writes "Easy to use with good integration capabilities and excellent at streamlining protocols". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleStrong Alt, whereas UKG is most compared with Workday, Ceridian Dayforce HCM, ADP Workforce Now, SAP HCM and Oracle Taleo.

See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.