PeopleSoft vs. Work.com
PeopleSoft is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 11 reviews vs Work.com which is ranked 24th in Talent Management with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "The most valuable feature for us is the integration between the HR Payroll and Financials modules. We really like the way they link and work together because there are no duplicate entries". The top reviewer of Work.com writes "Performance management and goals are the most valuable features. The UI needs to improve". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Ellucian and Oracle ERP Cloud. Work.com is most compared with . See our PeopleSoft vs. Work.com report.
+Add to compare
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about PeopleSoft vs. Work.com and other solutions. 310,623 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Check all options before a decision is made. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs. 310,623 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 15,288 Comparisons 6,153 Reviews 12 Followers 593 Avg. Rating 7.7 | Views 176 Comparisons 43 Reviews 2 Followers 94 Avg. Rating 6.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. | |
Learn | |
| Oracle | Salesforce |
Overview | |
| Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership. | Today_s workplace requires a new approach to performance management. Rypple is a web-based social performance management platform that helps companies improve performance through social goals, continuous feedback and meaningful recognition. |
Offer | |
Learn more about PeopleSoft | Learn more about Work.com |
Sample Customers | |
| BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford ChildrenĀs Health | Varsity Spirit |
Top Industries | |
Non Profit11% Individual & Family Service11% University11% Local Government11% Financial Services Firm13% University12% Marketing Services Firm10% Comms Service Provider10% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business13% Midsize Enterprise18% Large Enterprise68% Small Business19% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise63% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about PeopleSoft vs. Work.com and other solutions.
310,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also PeopleSoft Reviews, Work.com Reviews, and our list of Best Talent Management Companies.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 22000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 22000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.