Compare Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs. Silk Test

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Pros »

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.""The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.""The statistics that are available are very good.""The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.""The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

More Silk Test Pros »

Cons
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Cons »

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.""The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.""Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are.""The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies.""The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

More Silk Test Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list.
Top Answer: The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it… more »
Top Answer: Perforce is part of an old fashioned system that is not fully in the cloud. I would not suggest others use it unless they have some other solution for cloud integration. I would rate this solution a… more »
Top Answer: The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.
Top Answer: The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies. When tests are recorded on to Silk Central, there is a bit of a lack of clarity in terms of what needs to be fed into Silk Central and… more »
Top Answer: The solution is generally a framework for test functional automation. We use it for automation of web applications for the most part.
Ranking
29th
Views
59
Comparisons
21
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
468
Avg. Rating
5.0
14th
Views
5,407
Comparisons
3,599
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Perforce
Micro Focus
Overview

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Perforce QA Wizard Pro
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,CitrixKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 29th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with , whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.