Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs SmartBear TestLeft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
120 views|80 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
374 views|315 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Perforce QA Wizard Pro and SmartBear TestLeft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Pros →

"The most valuable features are test executor and development."

More SmartBear TestLeft Pros →

Cons
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Cons →

"TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved."

More SmartBear TestLeft Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
40th
Views
120
Comparisons
80
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
32nd
Views
374
Comparisons
315
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

SmartBear TestLeft a functional testing tool fully embedded in standard IDEs. TestLeft is a powerful yet lean functional testing tool for dev-testers working in Agile teams. It fully embeds into standard development IDEs. A built-in access to object and method library is also available with TestLeft. Dev-testers can thereby easily and quickly create robust functional automated tests without leaving their favorite IDEs such as Visual Studio. It also works well with other tools in dev eco-systems such as source control or continuous integration systems.
Sample Customers
Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix
American Red Cross, CISCO, HONDA, ADIDAS, TBC bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools while SmartBear TestLeft is ranked 32nd in Functional Testing Tools. Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0, while SmartBear TestLeft is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestLeft writes "Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced". Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with , whereas SmartBear TestLeft is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.