We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Perforce QA Wizard Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with .
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.