Compare Performance Center vs. Quality Center

Performance Center is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Quality Center is ranked 7th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. Performance Center is rated 8.6, while Quality Center is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Performance Center writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". Performance Center is most compared with StormRunner Load, LoadRunner and Apache JMeter, whereas Quality Center is most compared with TFS, UFT (QTP) and Performance Center.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center.IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center.We can book load generators.It is mostly user-friendly and usable.It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users.Support is nice, quick, and responsive.We implemented through the vendor, who used highly-skilled professionals.

Read more »

Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.

Read more »

Cons
While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test.Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format.It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side.New features have been added in latest version and need to be improved with the DevOps integration.We are expecting more flexible to use Jenkins in continuous integration going forward.

Read more »

The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools.ROI is 200%.

Read more »

Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ‚ÄčIt has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,184
Comparisons
2,992
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
400
Avg. Rating
8.6
7th
Views
4,726
Comparisons
3,374
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
456
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance CenterMicro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

Offer
Learn more about Performance Center
Learn more about Quality Center
Sample Customers
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlueQuality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Insurance Company16%
Retailer16%
Software R&D Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer6%
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company17%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Healthcare Company22%
Software R&D Company22%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email