We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Spirent Avalanche based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The fact that you can have tens of thousands of virtual users and just expand an army of load generators to hammer on whatever application you're testing."
"The solution supports a number of protocols."
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening"
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."
"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."
"I find network traffic testing the most valuable feature."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"I know there are integrations with continuous testing. It's got tie-ins to some of the newer tools to allow continuous testing. I'd love to see us not have to customize it, but for it to be out of the box."
"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."
"The solution could improve by increasing the Gbps speeds and by having better support for storage."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Spirent Avalanche is ranked 16th in Performance Testing Tools. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Spirent Avalanche is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent Avalanche writes "Quality traffic testing and is reasonably priced". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and Apache JMeter, whereas Spirent Avalanche is most compared with Ixia IxLoad, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Professional.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
