• Home
  • HUMAN BotGuard for Applications vs. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

HUMAN BotGuard for Applications vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending
As a result of the period that we are using this service, we were able to validate traffic quality. This enabled us to block bad, bot traffic.... Read more →
SeydouSidibe
Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available
By publishing the application without fear, my customer has created new revenue by making the website available anytime and anywhere. We noticed a... Read more →
Questions from the Community
Can PerimeterX Bot Defender be deployed in a cloud environment, such as A...
Top Answer:The solution seamlessly integrates with Azure infrastructure, making it easy for users to protect their web applications from malicious bot traffic. The integration process is straightforward. By… more »
Read all 2 answers   →
Can PerimeterX Bot Defender handle bot attacks that utilize rotating IP a...
Top Answer:The solution employs device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to accurately identify and block malicious bots, despite their IP address. With PerimeterX in place, users can successfully mitigated… more »
Read all 2 answers   →
What are some of the ways that account fraud is committed and how can Per...
Top Answer:One of the significant concerns with account fraud is the creation of fake accounts using stolen personally identifiable information. With PerimeterX Bot Defender, users are able to identify and block… more »
Read all 2 answers   →
Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Read all 5 answers   →
Ranking
28th
out of 64 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
Views
219
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
31st
out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
537
Comparisons
250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PerimeterX Bot Defender
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
HUMAN
Rohde & Schwarz
Overview

BotGuard for Applications safeguards your websites and mobile apps from sophisticated bots.

Using superior detection techniques, hacker intelligence, and collective protection across the internet, HUMAN detects and defeats bot attacks and fraud with unmatched scale, speed, and precision.

By employing insights that only HUMAN can provide, you will ensure that only real humans interact with your online applications and services.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Sample Customers
theTradeDesk
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Media Company9%
Retailer9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Government10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is ranked 28th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is rated 10.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HUMAN BotGuard for Applications writes "They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Shape Security, Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare and Cloudflare Bot Management, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.