HUMAN BotGuard for Applications vs SES WAF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HUMAN Logo
219 views|190 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
United Security Providers Logo
125 views|100 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and SES WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The solution seamlessly integrates with Azure infrastructure, making it easy for users to protect their web applications from malicious bot traffic. The integration process is straightforward. By… more »
Top Answer:The solution employs device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to accurately identify and block malicious bots, despite their IP address. With PerimeterX in place, users can successfully mitigated… more »
Top Answer:One of the significant concerns with account fraud is the creation of fake accounts using stolen personally identifiable information. With PerimeterX Bot Defender, users are able to identify and block… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
219
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
125
Comparisons
100
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PerimeterX Bot Defender
Learn More
Overview

BotGuard for Applications safeguards your websites and mobile apps from sophisticated bots.

Using superior detection techniques, hacker intelligence, and collective protection across the internet, HUMAN detects and defeats bot attacks and fraud with unmatched scale, speed, and precision.

By employing insights that only HUMAN can provide, you will ensure that only real humans interact with your online applications and services.

Information Not Available
Sample Customers
theTradeDesk
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Media Company9%
Retailer9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is ranked 28th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SES WAF is ranked 47th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is rated 10.0, while SES WAF is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HUMAN BotGuard for Applications writes "They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending". On the other hand, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Shape Security, Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare and Cloudflare Bot Management, whereas SES WAF is most compared with Imperva Web Application Firewall.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.