We performed a comparison between PernixData FVP [EOL] and Springpath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
PernixData FVP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Springpath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS). PernixData FVP [EOL] is rated 8.6, while Springpath [EOL] is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of PernixData FVP [EOL] writes "By adding storage intelligence at the server tier, it enables an architecture decoupling storage performance from capacity to utilize high speed server media in conjunction with any shared storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Springpath [EOL] writes "This product has a lot of room to improve: Competitors have a much larger feature-set, stability during installations/upgrades is a big issue.". PernixData FVP [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Springpath [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
