Compare Picus Security vs. XM Cyber HaXM

Picus Security is ranked 4th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Picus Security is rated 0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0. On the other hand, Picus Security is most compared with Verodin and SafeBreach, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate and Verodin.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Picus Security Logo
57 views|42 comparisons
XM Cyber HaXM Logo
46 views|29 comparisons
Ranking
Views
57
Comparisons
42
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
46
Comparisons
29
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 76% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 63% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Learn
Picus Security
XM Cyber
Overview

Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Picus Security
Learn more about XM Cyber HaXM
Sample Customers
Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı KrediOvum, Plymouth Rock Corporation
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.