We performed a comparison between PingAccess and SAP Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."The solution is highly stable and scalable"
"It is an SAP product, so it integrates very well with other SAP products."
"The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."
"It would be better if we could also manage other systems with it. Currently, you have to purchase plugins for it to work with other non-SAP systems. It would be good if there is an easy way to integrate SAP Access Control with other non-SAP systems."
Earn 20 points
PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review while SAP Access Control is ranked 22nd in Access Management. PingAccess is rated 10.0, while SAP Access Control is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Access Control writes "Automates our user provisioning process and integrates very well with other SAP products but needs better integration with non-SAP products". PingAccess is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and ForgeRock, whereas SAP Access Control is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.