Compare PingAccess vs. Symantec Siteminder
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use PingAccess? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2021. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature Top Answer: Since we're in the early stages of examining the solution, it's hard to predict what might be lacking. We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation… more » Top Answer: We primarily want to use the solution to implement our SSO, Single Sign-On solution. |
Ranking  | |
Views 76 Comparisons 63 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 3,649 Comparisons 2,475 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 435 Rating 7.7 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 31% of the time.  Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder | |
Learn | |
| Ping Identity | Broadcom |
Overview | |
PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine. It provides secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL level, and ensures that only authorized users access the resources they need. | Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world. |
Offer | |
Learn more about PingAccess | Learn more about Symantec Siteminder |
Sample Customers | |
Information Not Available | British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm40% Insurance Company8% Comms Service Provider8% Healthcare Company8% Computer Software Company30% Comms Service Provider12% Financial Services Firm11% Insurance Company6% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business4% Midsize Enterprise3% Large Enterprise93% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PingAccess is ranked 26th in Access Management while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 8th in Access Management with 3 reviews. PingAccess is rated 0.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Provides centralized and secure policy management on a large scale". PingAccess is most compared with , whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, PingID, ForgeRock, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and Symantec VIP Access Manager.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.