Compare PingAccess vs. Symantec Siteminder

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PingAccess Logo
76 views|63 comparisons
Symantec Siteminder Logo
3,649 views|2,475 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PingAccess? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature
Top Answer: Since we're in the early stages of examining the solution, it's hard to predict what might be lacking. We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation… more »
Top Answer: We primarily want to use the solution to implement our SSO, Single Sign-On solution.
Ranking
26th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
76
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
8th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
3,649
Comparisons
2,475
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
Learn
Ping Identity
Broadcom
Overview

PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine. It provides secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL level, and ensures that only authorized users access the resources they need.

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Offer
Learn more about PingAccess
Learn more about Symantec Siteminder
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm40%
Insurance Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise93%
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PingAccess is ranked 26th in Access Management while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 8th in Access Management with 3 reviews. PingAccess is rated 0.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Provides centralized and secure policy management on a large scale". PingAccess is most compared with , whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, PingID, ForgeRock, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and Symantec VIP Access Manager.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.