PingDataGovernance vs SAP Data Governance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PingDataGovernance and SAP Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, erwin by Quest and others in Data Governance.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use PingDataGovernance?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements.
Top Answer:The solution is used in Life Cycle Data Management where it can be stored in cheaper storage options like Amazon and OpenShift. It has helped with data retention.
Ranking
51st
out of 57 in Data Governance
Views
36
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 57 in Data Governance
Views
539
Comparisons
478
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
105
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

PingDataGovernance provides policy-based, fine-grained access controls for attribute-by-attribute data protection and filtering for regulatory compliance and consent management. It has a graphical user interface for business users to collaboratively build, test and enforce access control policies to data across user directories and APIs. It provides a centralized solution to authorize and filter API calls in real time—a huge benefit to managing and enforcing customer data privacy.

SAP Data Governance helps consolidate and centrally govern the master data lifecycle of information across the organization. Key benefits: Consolidate and manage master data across the business, whether information is exchanged and accessed in SAP or non-SAP solutions on premise or in the cloud. Uses prebuilt data models, rules, workflows, and user interfaces to quickly deploy tasks such as financial consolidation, customer service, and supplier onboarding. And supports all your master data domains in one single application, and implement it in an on-premise, cloud, or hybrid environment.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., The VELUX Group, Asian Paints, AOK Bundesverband, EMC Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Data Governance
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, erwin by Quest and others in Data Governance. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PingDataGovernance is ranked 51st in Data Governance while SAP Data Governance is ranked 19th in Data Governance with 2 reviews. PingDataGovernance is rated 0.0, while SAP Data Governance is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Governance writes "A robust solution that establishes rules, policies, and procedures". PingDataGovernance is most compared with , whereas SAP Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Informatica Axon and Alation Data Catalog.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.