We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Planit Functional Testing Services vs. ZenQ Functional Testing Services

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
11
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Planit
Video Not Available
ZenQ
Video Not Available
Overview

Our team can test low level functionality of your system, working as part of your team to ensure quality through component and unit testing.

As an ISO 27001:2013 certified, SOC II and HIPAA compliant organization, for over a decade, we have been helping clients across the globe release high-quality software products to the market on -time and within budgets.
With the state-of-the-art infrastructure in our Centers of Excellence, Test labs and continuous investment in building IPs/Accelerators, we deliver mission-critical testing solutions tailored to client’s business requirements with a dedicated team of over 400 skilled and experienced QA professionals in US and India.

Offer
Learn more about Planit Functional Testing Services
Learn more about ZenQ Functional Testing Services
Sample Customers
Medibank, origin, telstra, foxtel, jacobs
Information Not Available

Planit Functional Testing Services is ranked 54th in Application Testing Services while ZenQ Functional Testing Services is ranked 39th in Application Testing Services. Planit Functional Testing Services is rated 0.0, while ZenQ Functional Testing Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Planit Functional Testing Services is most compared with , whereas ZenQ Functional Testing Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.