Compare Plixer Scrutinizer vs. Statseeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
3,504 views|1,687 comparisons
Statseeker Logo
2,225 views|766 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Plixer Scrutinizer vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to track what a device is doing and to go back historically. It is also able to go down to, and identify, very low levels of traffic.""The ability to view the status of the top-10 at a glance is helpful. We immediately know which link is over-utilized or heavily used... and it's all in real-time.""It's agnostic as far as what your network gear is. As long as it supports an sFlow, JFlow, NetFlow, some kind of flow monitoring, Plixer will support it very well.""There are other tools out there that will do what Scrutinizer does. But what I have found with Scrutinizer is that it does it very quickly. I've taken 25 million individual data fragments from the different sensors, and it has graphed that and mapped it and presented a picture within 30 seconds. It has a very efficient database algorithm that I am really impressed with.""The reporting and generating troubleshooting reports would be the best feature; our host-to-host conversation reporting.""As a network engineer, the ability to identify what traffic on the link is consuming all the bandwidth at any given time, and provide immediate feedback to the business, is the most valuable feature.""We have had many requests to understand in the network which devices are connected to others. Most people don't have this information or are able to establish a map of data flow everywhere around the network. Scrutinizer can really help with this. We are using it to understand who is talking to what, how, and which protocols can help us to improve security and analyze flow.""The solution helps to enrich the data context of our network traffic. It allows me to see what applications are most in use on a slightly historical basis, going back a day or week at tops. It allows me to tune QoS or traffic shaping around what's being used. It saves me from having to unnecessarily upgrade, if I don't need to."

More Plixer Scrutinizer Pros »

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics.""We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was.""The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us.""Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable.""This solution allowed us to track down trouble users.""In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed.""Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is.""It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

More Statseeker Pros »

Cons
"The reporting structure, the front-end GUI, also needs some work. It needs some getting used to. It works fairly well, but it's a technical tool rather than a user tool. You have to understand the structure of the databases before you can really use it.""The solution creates a visual map of a particular location and how the network flows. You need to spend time to generate all those maps. If they could figure out a way to reduce the time needed to generate the maps, that would be great.""They're working on the security areas, so it can provide more insight. What they have is still pretty much IP-concentric. If they were to make it IP and URL, they'd be a little bit ahead on that.""Knowing that they're coming out with a new user interface, that is an area where there is room for improvement. There are so many variables. They should limit the variables in the user interface and create some classes, like "simple," "novice," and "expert" to narrow down the variables within it.""There is room for improvement around the data that they have on the website about solutions... they should have more templated solutions on their website. Going out and identifying how to do RTP performance with a Cisco router, or how to do application response times in an Arrista data center deployment was where most of the work was... They should spend some more time documenting solutions and putting together white papers.""For updating the Scrutinizer platform, when we have the actual data, it never happens in one day. Every time we have the data, we are obliged to install a new server in order to integrate the old data, and every time it has a problem. Most of the time, we were obliged to scrap all the data because we couldn't transfer it to the new server. So, it would be very good if they could improve this part.""The visual acuity of how it presents data can sometimes be confusing. It takes a bit for people to spin up how to look at the graphs.""It would be useful if there was a way to back up the configuration information. E.g., if you wanted to deploy a new instance or disaster recovery, you could quite easily deploy and restore the config, as opposed to having to restore all the NetFlow data. If there was just a button that said "backup config information", that would be good."

More Plixer Scrutinizer Cons »

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly.""Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards.""I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice.""We haven't seen an ROI.""I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like.""With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud.""The user interface needs to be made more intuitive.""This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

More Statseeker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to some of the other tools we have, it's incredibly reasonably priced.""Our entire solution, amortized over five years, is in the vicinity of $40,000 to $50,000 a year.""We pay our one-off cost for the licenses, per device, in blocks of 50. And then we pay an annual maintenance fee of about $15,000 Australian, which is, at this point in time, about $9,000 US, for those 250 devices. The upfront costs for the 250-license use, were about $50,000 Australian, which is about $32,000 US.""The license is per device. We have 50 devices.""We just renewed. The pricing is 5,000 euro per year. This is the final price. All tax (20 percent) is included.""We have increased the license over time. We have added more licenses as the network has grown.""There is a recurring maintenance fee after the initial purchase or if we want the license upgrade.""There are no extra costs. It's about $8,000 a year. The bang for the buck (cost) is definitely a plus."

More Plixer Scrutinizer Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance.""We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year.""It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is.""It's probably $5K a year for the license.""Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced.""We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD.""The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500.""When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

More Statseeker Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,504
Comparisons
1,687
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
1,702
Rating
8.9
12th
Views
2,225
Comparisons
766
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
Plixer
Statseeker
Overview

The Scrutinizer incident response system leverages network traffic analytics to provide active monitoring, visualization, and reporting of network and security incidents. The system quickly delivers the rich forensic data needed by IT professionals to support fast and efficient incident response.

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Offer
Learn more about Plixer Scrutinizer
Learn more about Statseeker
Sample Customers
Oxford Networks, Squaw Valley Ski Holdings, UltiSat, Wipro, West Aurora School District 129, SUNY Geneseo College, Bloomington Public Schools, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Kitsap Credit Union, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston Texas, Carilion Clinic, Banner Health, IDEXX Laboratories, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Goodwill Industries, Parmalat, Armstrong Coal Company, Flybe, James WalkerWith active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Government14%
Insurance Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company31%
University14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government11%
Media Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise80%
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about Plixer Scrutinizer vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Plixer Scrutinizer is ranked 7th in Network Monitoring Software with 10 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 26 reviews. Plixer Scrutinizer is rated 9.0, while Statseeker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Plixer Scrutinizer writes "Advanced reporting runs analytics on NetFlow and provides signature-based recognition of problems in the network environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Reduces the complexity of your network monitoring and is easy to use". Plixer Scrutinizer is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, PRTG Network Monitor, Flowmon Solution and Darktrace, whereas Statseeker is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios XI and PRTG Network Monitor. See our Plixer Scrutinizer vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.