Compare Plutora vs. Silk Central

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Plutora Logo
819 views|605 comparisons
Silk Central Logo
1,335 views|712 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Plutora? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

More Silk Central Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
819
Comparisons
605
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
10th
Views
1,335
Comparisons
712
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,007
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Plutora Release Management, Plutora Release, Plutora Test Environment ManagementBorland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn
Plutora
Micro Focus
Overview

Plutora Release is a SaaS solution that manages software delivery across the entire enterprise release portfolio and throughout the complete lifecycle of each release including planning, approval and execution.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about Plutora
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
eBay, United Energy and Multinet Gas (UE & MG), Service NSW, AMP, Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Government9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company9%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Plutora is ranked 19th in Test Management Tools while Silk Central is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Plutora is rated 0.0, while Silk Central is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Central writes "A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions". Plutora is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, XebiaLabs XL Release , XebiaLabs XL Deploy, UrbanCode Deploy and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest and TestRail by Gurock.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.