We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
