Compare PTC Integrity vs. Polarion ALM

Polarion ALM is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Polarion ALM is rated 5.0, while PTC Integrity is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "Straightforward setup and the support is ok, but usability is hindered by too many items in one LiveDoc". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". Polarion ALM is most compared with PTC Integrity, JIRA and codeBeamer ALM, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Polarion ALM Logo
1,239 views|1,063 comparisons
PTC Integrity Logo
1,822 views|1,375 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs.The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it.

Read more »

We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.

Read more »

Cons
The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on.The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience.

Read more »

To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,239
Comparisons
1,063
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
5.0
Views
1,822
Comparisons
1,375
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
686
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
MKS
Learn
Siemens
PTC
Overview

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about Polarion ALM
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel GroupTRW Automotive
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email