Compare Polycom ContentConnect vs. Polycom Pano

Polycom ContentConnect is ranked 24th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Polycom Pano is ranked 22nd in Content Collaboration Platforms. Polycom ContentConnect is rated 0, while Polycom Pano is rated 0. On the other hand, Polycom ContentConnect is most compared with , whereas Polycom Pano is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
2
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
6
Comparisons
6
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
ContentConnectPano
Learn
Poly
Poly
Overview

Polycom ContentConnect solution delivers native content sharing experience between Skype for Business and non-Skype for Business environments for highly collaborative video meeting experience shared among disparate devices and networks. The ContentConnect is a virtual server application and a critical component of the Polycom RealConnect for Skype for Business solution as it handles contents shared across Skype for Business users and traditional videoconference systems. This innovative approach makes the whole video collaboration experience easy and consistent, which drives user adoption.

With Polycom Pano, sharing is no longer just content delivery, it's a forum for many people and ideas to come together in a single place. Polycom Pano allows multiple users to connect and up to four sources to be displayed simultaneously.

Offer
Learn more about Polycom ContentConnect
Learn more about Polycom Pano
Sample Customers
7-Eleven, Abbotsleigh School, Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce & Sectoral Associations, Agricultural Bank of China, ALAIN AFFLELOU, Align Technology, America University of Kuwait, Anders Andersens Rengoring, Andong Medical Center, AOL, Arbitration Courts of Russian Federation, Arcor, Associação Pró-Vida, Astellas Pharmaceutical, Auburn University, Auchan France, Auchan Poland, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge Hospital, Banco PINE, Baptist Health, Beacon Communities, Bene, Beth Melsky Casting and Envision, Bilfinger Berger Hochbau,, BMC Software, Boretti, Buhler Group, Buro Happold, Buskerud (Oslo Fjord Alliance), Camp Quality, Canterbury and West Coast District Health Board, CARE Ratings, CEANNE, CEMIG7-Eleven, Abbotsleigh School Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce & Sectoral Associations, Agricultural Bank of China, ALAIN AFFLELOU, Align Technology, America University of Kuwait, Anders Andersens, Rengoring, Andong Medical Center, AOL
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.