Polyspace Code Prover vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Polyspace Code Prover and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Code Prover vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The outputs are very reliable.""Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool.""The product detects memory corruptions.""Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect.""When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

More Polyspace Code Prover Pros →

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood is flexible.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes.""The tool has some stability issues.""I'd like the data to be taken from any format.""Automation could be a challenge.""One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

More Polyspace Code Prover Cons →

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes.""CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts… more »
Top Answer:There are two main areas of improvement. * False negatives and false positives. * The speed of the validation itself. Another area I see for improvement is scalability, particularly when dealing with… more »
Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
Ranking
Views
1,776
Comparisons
1,181
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
656
Rating
7.6
Views
193
Comparisons
121
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
225
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
Learn More
MathWorks
Video Not Available
Overview

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Sample Customers
Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
Digicel
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company34%
Computer Software Company15%
Transportation Company7%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Educational Organization9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise64%
Buyer's Guide
Polyspace Code Prover vs. Spirent CyberFlood
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Polyspace Code Prover vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Polyspace Code Prover is ranked 23rd in Application Security Tools with 5 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. Polyspace Code Prover is rated 7.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Polyspace Code Prover writes "A stable solution for developing software components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Polyspace Code Prover is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork, CodeSonar and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our Polyspace Code Prover vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.