We performed a comparison between Ivanti NAC and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."
"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."
"It's a stable product."
"The technical support is top-notch."
"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."
"It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components."
"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."
"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"It would be good to integrate Portnox CORE with CLEAR."
"It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls."
"It could be a little cheaper."
"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."
"The price could be better."
Ivanti NAC is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while Portnox CORE is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox Clear. See our Ivanti NAC vs. Portnox CORE report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
