We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Repeater and the BApp extensions are particularly useful. Certain extensions, such as the Active Scan extensions and the Autoracer extension, are very good."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"In my area of expertise, I feel like it has almost everything I could possibly require at this moment."
"The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price."
"This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite does not hamper the node of the server, and it does not shut down the server if it is running."
"With the Extender Tab, if you know how to code then you can create a plugin and add it to Burp."
"Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."
"One area that can be improved, when compared to alternative tools, is that they could provide different reporting options and in different formats like PDF or something like that."
"One thing that is not up to the mark in PortSwigger is web application testing. I found some issues with its performance and reporting. They should work on these and give us a better outcome."
"I am from Brazil. The currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep. It is almost six to one. It would be good if it can be sold in the local currency, and its price is cheaper for us."
"I need the solution to be more user-friendly. The solution needs to be user-friendly."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"There is not much automation in the tool."
"The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
