PowerSteering vs Procore Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PowerSteering Logo
373 views|82 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Procore Technologies Logo
404 views|350 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PowerSteering and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
  • More Procore Project Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The financial side of Procore Project Management is better.
    Top Answer:The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    373
    Comparisons
    82
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    24th
    Views
    404
    Comparisons
    350
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    204
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Enterprise-scale, on-demand software for project and portfolio management.

    Procore Technologies, Inc. provides cloud-based construction software to clients across the globe. Using its award-winning suite of project management tools, hundreds of thousands of registered Procore users manage all types of construction projects including industrial plants, office buildings, apartment complexes, university facilities, retail centers, and more.

    Sample Customers
    Church Pension Group, UK Highways Agency, US Department of Defense, Electrocomponents, Novation, Staples, Molex, Polyone, NHS Lincolnshire
    Consigli,Doran,Harvey,HITT,Mortenson construction,Robins and Morton
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government11%
    Retailer9%
    Construction Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Management Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    PowerSteering is ranked 18th in Project Portfolio Management while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. PowerSteering is rated 8.0, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of PowerSteering writes "Excellent portfolio management SaaS - strategy, savings, visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". PowerSteering is most compared with , whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Asana, Planview PPM Pro and Meridian Proliance PPM.

    See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.