Ranking | |
Views 81 Comparisons 47 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 82 Comparisons 46 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2021. 457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
Also Known As | |
WorkEngine, EPM Live | |
Learn | |
PowerSteering Video Not Available | Upland |
Overview | |
Enterprise-scale, on-demand software for project and portfolio management. | EPM Live is the leading work management platform that revolutionizes the way organizations manage projects and work. EPM Live's platform is the first build to order platform that extends project portfolio management (PPM) to all areas of the business regardless of work focus. Small to large organizations can apply cost saving disciplines such as delivering projects successfully, optimizing resource utilization, and selecting the right work to all business teams |
Offer | |
Learn more about PowerSteering | Learn more about Upland WorkEngine |
Sample Customers | |
Church Pension Group, UK Highways Agency, US Department of Defense, Electrocomponents, Novation, Staples, Molex, Polyone, NHS Lincolnshire | BMC, Cantor Fitzgerald, Ciena, Staples, Church Pension Group, Electrocomponents, The Hershey Company, Vectron, EmblemHealth, Eaton Truck Division, Giodamce Software, Crosspoint Engineering, Trinity, Missouri Department of Conservation |
PowerSteering is ranked 25th in Project Portfolio Management while Upland WorkEngine is ranked 51st in Project Management Software. PowerSteering is rated 0.0, while Upland WorkEngine is rated 0.0. On the other hand, PowerSteering is most compared with , whereas Upland WorkEngine is most compared with .
See our list of .
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.