Compare PractiTest vs. Silk Central

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PractiTest Logo
817 views|650 comparisons
Silk Central Logo
854 views|483 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven.
Top Answer: Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive. There were no additional fees, everything was included in the license and the online support was great.
Top Answer: It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
13th
Views
817
Comparisons
650
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
21st
Views
854
Comparisons
483
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Borland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn More
Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about PractiTest
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider15%
Insurance Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PractiTest is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools. PractiTest is rated 8.0, while Silk Central is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". On the other hand, PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Jira, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Tricentis qTest.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.