Dave CarterTest Team Lead at a computer software company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."
Earn 20 points
Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional wayProfessional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.
PractiTest is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools. PractiTest is rated 8.0, while Silk Central is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". On the other hand, PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Jira, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Tricentis qTest.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.