We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The product helps us create test cases and reports."
"I use the solution for test management."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."
"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
