Dave CarterTest Team Lead at a computer software company
HashemAlhaririIT Testing Manager at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional wayProfessional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!
PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while TestRail by Gurock is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.0, while TestRail by Gurock is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail by Gurock writes "Easy to write new test cases and test plans and it is flexible". PractiTest is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tricentis qTest, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Tricentis Tosca, whereas TestRail by Gurock is most compared with TFS, Zephyr Enterprise, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis qTest and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.