Compare PractiTest vs. TestRail by Gurock

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PractiTest Logo
919 views|700 comparisons
TestRail by Gurock Logo
4,539 views|3,088 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros »

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful.""The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it.""The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition.""From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."

More TestRail by Gurock Pros »

Cons
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons »

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools.""I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were.""It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language.""I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

More TestRail by Gurock Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

More TestRail by Gurock Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven.
Top Answer: Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive. There were no additional fees, everything was included in the license and the online support was great.
Top Answer: It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for… more »
Top Answer: From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're… more »
Top Answer: Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more.
Top Answer: I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
919
Comparisons
700
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
5th
Views
4,539
Comparisons
3,088
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
611
Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

Offer
Learn more about PractiTest
Learn more about TestRail by Gurock
Sample Customers
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider17%
Insurance Company10%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise29%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,189 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while TestRail by Gurock is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.0, while TestRail by Gurock is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail by Gurock writes "Easy to write new test cases and test plans and it is flexible". PractiTest is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tricentis qTest, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Tricentis Tosca, whereas TestRail by Gurock is most compared with TFS, Zephyr Enterprise, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis qTest and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.