We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Complete integration with VS IDE and Office tools: This give us a possibility of high-level automation, thus minimizing human error."
"TFS’s test management capability without the expensive licensing has large gaps. Users will be unable to access performance testing and coded UI testing capabilities."
"The solution is very much stable."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"The initial setup is fairly easy."
"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"The interface is good with TFS."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"The solution's server for deployment needs to be improved."
"Its pricing could be improved."
"It would be better if we could bring it out on the cloud."
"The reporting functionality is something that they should work on."
"As an end-user, I expect the solution's performance to be faster while staying as stable as possible."
"Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.