Compare PractiTest vs. Tricentis qTest

PractiTest is ranked 19th in Test Management Tools while Tricentis qTest is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. PractiTest is rated 0, while Tricentis qTest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis qTest writes "Provides a central point of reference for tracking bugs and failures, who owns the issue and its status". PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Tricentis qTest, whereas Tricentis qTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TFS and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PractiTest Logo
1,355 views|907 comparisons
Tricentis qTest Logo
5,373 views|3,108 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PractiTest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license.It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market.Our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year.The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
1,355
Comparisons
907
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
5,373
Comparisons
3,108
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
2,048
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
qTest
Learn
PractiTest
Tricentis
Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


QASymphony is a leading provider of enterprise test case management, test analytics and exploratory testing solutions for agile development and QA teams. Our solutions help companies create better software by improving speed, efficiency and collaboration during the testing process.
Offer
Learn more about PractiTest
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
Sample Customers
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, FreemanAmazon, Salesforce, Barclays, Adobe, SecureWorks, Samsung, OfficeDepot, Zappos, Cisco, Visa, Verizon, FICO, Silverpop, Nordstrom
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Insurance Company13%
Manufacturing Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.