Compare PractiTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PractiTest Logo
942 views|714 comparisons
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
4,544 views|2,945 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros »

"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise.""It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."

More Zephyr Enterprise Pros »

Cons
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons »

"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular.""We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."

More Zephyr Enterprise Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."

More Zephyr Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven.
Top Answer: Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive. There were no additional fees, everything was included in the license and the online support was great.
Top Answer: It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for… more »
Top Answer: It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case… more »
Top Answer: We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide… more »
Top Answer: We have been working with DFS for almost six or seven years. We have a lot of automation in our own framework, and DFS is supporting that framework. We have integrated DFS with our automation… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
942
Comparisons
714
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
739
Rating
8.0
8th
Views
4,544
Comparisons
2,945
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
532
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SmartBear Zephyr
Learn More
Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Transform your organization and produce high quality software, quickly. Get to market faster, reduce risk and accelerate time to revenue. Future proof your test management investment with a platform that easily configures to your evolving processes.

Legacy systems have no place in your agile business. They hinder more than they help. It is time to retire those legacy test management solutions with today’s technology, integrations, deployment models and a simplified licensing model.

Measure. Analyze. Share. Elevate visibility across the organization. Make well-informed business decisions with real-time information that comes in from across your globally distributed teams.


Offer
Learn more about PractiTest
Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise
Sample Customers
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PractiTest is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 8th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Useful for test case management and automation integration, but it should have a utility for automation integration". PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tricentis qTest, Jira and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, TFS and SpecFlow.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.