We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has an easy setup with clear instructions and helpful engineers. Deployment is seamless, although the time may vary. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring daily monitoring and maintenance, and it can take anywhere from a few hours to a month.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers a management console, compliance monitoring, and micro-segmentation, as well as auto-remediation capabilities and vulnerability scanning. Trend Micro Cloud One has excellent vulnerability protection and login inspection, as well as control over server access and application installation, and good workload management. Prisma Cloud needs more customizable dashboards, better automation, better coverage for GCP and Oracle, and improved support. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, Azure support, automation, robustness, initial setup, and alerts.
Pricing: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a convoluted credit-based pricing model that can be difficult to comprehend, although it is deemed pricey, it is deemed a good investment for safeguarding multi-cloud setups. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the mid-range and can be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. While extra services may accumulate, the overall cost is seen as fair and has even decreased by 25% in recent times.
Service and Support: Prisma Cloud has received mixed reviews, with some customers praising their technical support and account managers, while others experienced slow response times. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has generally received positive feedback for their knowledgeable and responsive support team.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides better risk clarity, faster issue detection, improved compliance, and increased productivity compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. However, Trend Micro Cloud One is more flexible and easier to integrate.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One based on user reviews. Prisma Cloud offers a wider range of features, including continuous cloud compliance monitoring, network security, and identity-based micro-segmentation, and provides a single pane of glass for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"It has helped us understand the dynamic topology of our containers, and manage security through the application of policies that our pipelines apply straight from Git."
"The CVEs are valuable because we used to have a tool to scan CVEs, at the language level, for the dependencies that our developers had. What is good about Prisma Cloud is that the CVEs are not only from the software layer, but from all layers: the language, the base image, and you also have CVEs from the host. It covers the full base of security."
"The first aspect that is important is the fact that Prisma Cloud is cloud-agnostic. It's actually available for the five top cloud providers: AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle, and Alibaba Cloud. The second aspect is the fact that we can write our own rules to try to detect misconfigurations in those environments."
"Its ease of integration is valuable because we need to get the solution out of the door quickly, so speed and ease matter."
"I find the CSPM area to be a more valuable and flexible feature."
"The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass."
"Cloud security posture management is the preferred feature among other vendors."
"Due to the maturity of most companies, security posture management is the most valuable feature."
"The security is good."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"Based on my experience, the customization—especially the interface and some of the product identification components—is not as customizable as it could be. But it makes up for that with the fact that we can access the API and then build our own systems to read the data and then process and parse it and hand it to our teams."
"The UI is the worst."
"This solution is more AWS and Azure-centric. It needs to be more specific on the GCP side, which they are working on."
"The information presented in the UI sometimes doesn't look intuitive enough."
"Prisma Cloud's dashboards should be customizable. That's very important. Other similar solutions are more elastic so you have the power to create customized dashboards. In Prisma Cloud, you cannot do that."
"When it comes to compliance, the issue is that when we are exporting the reports, there is only a single compliance option. If I need to report on multiple compliance requirements, that feature isn't available. For example, I made a single report for ISO 27000 but I can't correlate it with GDPR."
"We would like it to have more features from the risk and compliance perspectives."
"We have discovered that Prisma is not functioning properly with GCP."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 83 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and AWS GuardDuty, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and AWS Security Hub. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
