ProcessMaker vs Red Hat Polymita Business Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ProcessMaker Logo
767 views|495 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
187 views|161 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine.""What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros →

"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."

More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pros →

Cons
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects.""Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

More ProcessMaker Cons →

"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."

More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Without any discount, you need tools that cost roughly between $80,000 to $100,000. That is less than with IBM. And on top of that you need the consulting. That will be another $200,000. So a quarter to a third of a million dollars is needed to use get started with BPM. So I usually recommend to my clients that they begin with a little project, with the community version. That way they don't spend $200,000 or $300,000, they spend $150,000 and zero on software."
  • More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    767
    Comparisons
    495
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    187
    Comparisons
    161
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
    Polymita Business Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

    Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite combines business process management (BPM), business rules management (BRM), business resource planning, and complex event processing (CEP) technologies into a single, integrated, open source platform. JBoss BPM Suite lets project stakeholders collaborate to build business automation solutions with a choice of modeling tools. This includes a web-based authoring environment for business experts and an Eclipse plug-in for developers. A rich set of tools for process and decision management covers the full process life cycle - from modeling, simulation, and testing to deployment, monitoring, and optimization. Process and decision logic can be modeled and automated together, without the need to learn multiple tools or develop custom integrations between disparate environments.
    Sample Customers
    Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
    Bayer, Grupo Televisa, RCBC, Peavey
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM). ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.