We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."
"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."
"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."
"The solution provides data mining and AI features."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."
"The solution is complex."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"Signavio already offers a wonderful range of functions. If variant management and customer journeys are optimized, Signavio can definitely bask in the glory of BPM tools. We also see optimization potential in the management of licenses, e.g. no named users but rather floating licenses and integration into the company's active directory."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
Earn 20 points
ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our ProcessMaker vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
