We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"A complete project management suite in one integrated package."
"The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."
"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."
ProcessMaker is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Newgen OmniFlow, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.