Compare Prodacapo vs. SAS Activity-Based Management
Views
50
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
273
Comparisons
165
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Domo, Oracle, Board International and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: April 2021.
476,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 65% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
FCG Prodacapo Group provides solutions for improving the value of service delivery in health and social care. We are the leading provider of time-driven activity based costing and performance management solutions for Value-Based Healthcare across Finland, Sweden, Norway and the United Kingdom.
SAS Activity-Based Management is an analytic application that models business processes to determine cost, profitability and drivers. With this solution, organizations can make informed decisions that streamline processes, deliver revenue growth and reduce costs across the organization.
Learn more about Prodacapo
Learn more about SAS Activity-Based Management
Pipeline Group
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Find out what your peers are saying about Domo, Oracle, Board International and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: April 2021.
476,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Prodacapo is ranked 33rd in Business Performance Management while SAS Activity-Based Management is ranked 23rd in Business Performance Management. Prodacapo is rated 0.0, while SAS Activity-Based Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Prodacapo is most compared with , whereas SAS Activity-Based Management is most compared with Oracle Hyperion and IBM Cognos.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.