Planview ProjectPlace vs Teamwork comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Planview Logo
663 views|407 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Teamwork Logo
596 views|390 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview ProjectPlace and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Planview ProjectPlace vs. Teamwork Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Planview Projectplace is a really good solution for document sharing and keeping track of the history of changes in the document. I also like that you can have everything you need for a project in one place, for example, for documentation, planning, and even resource planning.""It is a complete solution. It is very useful for the management of our internal processes.""The workspace ease, navigation, and portfolios are the most valuable aspects of this solution. I just got access to the portfolios from my upper management, so I'm able to look at our specific SRE portfolio to see what's a priority, look at how many hours we've tracked, and things like that. I'm not so much included in the budgeting but it's important to see what projects are higher priority and so forth.""The overall user interface is fantastic. It has been very easy to learn and use. Any non-technical person with some initial training can work on it from day one, which is very good. The learning material is very good and easy to learn. There is no need to spend additional money on the training.""Projectplace has excellent collaboration features, including some nice kanban boards. We use DocuSign, and Planview just integrated it into Projectplace, so that was helpful. And I like the fact that it links to Enterprise One, the other Planview tool that we use to manage our capital portfolio.""Clarizen's slide publisher is one of my favorite features.""Projectplace absolutely supports collaboration in real-time. It's probably one of the best tools out there for collaboration. It affects the project's progress quite a bit. I have started two very similar projects in two separate business units, on very similar teams. I did one with Enterprise One, I did one with Projectplace just to see how the mileage would vary. The one with Projectplace had a very short cycle time so we were able to finish the project earlier. The one with Enterprise One was less engaging and it took a little more time. Because we were tracking the tasks inside the schedule it was not on the cards.""The most useful features of Planview are its integration with resource management and the ability to commit and reserve various resources."

More Planview ProjectPlace Pros →

"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports.""It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy.""The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."

More Teamwork Pros →

Cons
"An area of improvement is customer support and services. Sometimes, the issue reported is not resolved within a specific timeframe, and the technical consultants who are approached for the requirement finalization can be better in terms of understanding the requirements. Sometimes, there is a gap in understanding the requirements. Other than that, the solution is fine.""The reporting end of it needs improvement. There should be more reporting, more data at your fingertips. It should be easier and a little more user-friendly. I know there is some there, but it's just how do you get more meat on the bones, if you will, of what's available.""It needs some improvement in the project planning reports, ad hoc reports, and some big file transfers are a challenge. If you were going to transfer some 10 MB or 12 MB document with your team members, then it might have some problems in uploading and sharing those files. The overall dashboard view needs some advancement in its visualizations and uploading a large file size is a challenge.""If the mobile app were improved to show more information then it would be good.""We'd like to see a heartier connection between Projectplace and Enterprise One. We know that's on their roadmap, but they haven't gotten there yet. Planview could also make better use of Projectplace's template capability.""The time reporting is an excellent feature that they can show from an individual. The only problem I see is the description field. You can't increase that field, like to pull the column and widen the column that I've seen. I'm not seeing anywhere you could do that. Because you may have some of these cards that start with the same name and you only have so much real estate. There should be a way to adjust those columns somewhat so you can look at the description or hover over it and it tells you what the description is.""It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs.""Planview is a resource management and project management system. Projectplace allows you to create boards and associate some of Planview's work breakdown structure as a top-level tree under which you can place cards, but there are many limitations because when you make a change in Planview, it is reflected in Projectplace. However, except for a few specific things, changes made in Projectplace are not ported back to Planview. At this point, they're two completely different products. The flaw is that there is very little integration between the two."

More Planview ProjectPlace Cons →

"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution.""The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app.""The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."

More Teamwork Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the price of Projectplace is highly reasonable for the amount of functionality that you get. We have what they call a FLEX License. That means you get Projectplace, Enterprise One, and Leankits all on the same license. That's great because then you can use the other products without any additional cost."
  • "In my opinion, the pricing is reasonable."
  • "I believe it is a good value for money for the service they provide and the tailored program. When compared to Microsoft Project."
  • "The cost of this product is mid-range. It's not too expensive but not the cheapest on the market."
  • "Pricing might be a challenge because it costs around $29 to $30 per user a month. If you have a large user base, around 100 to 200 users, then it might be costly for an organization. For organizations who do not have a comprehensive overall budget, it might be a challenge."
  • "I would say the licensing maturity was probably a three out of five. They have a long way to go before they can scale out and retain enterprise customers."
  • "It can be expensive, but if you see the functionalities and the processes, it's not as expensive as other applications. We pay about 1 million Mexican Pesos per year for all 100 licenses."
  • "Its pricing plan should be improved. It could be expensive for midsize or small companies. There are no additional costs, but it would be great if you can negotiate or confirm the price during the requirement analysis phase."
  • More Planview ProjectPlace Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs of the solution."
  • "We negotiate on pricing since we are a long-term user."
  • More Teamwork Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It simplifies the management of our day-to-day work and brings all our processes into a single place where we can plan our activities, monitor them, and take any actions accordingly.
    Top Answer:Its pricing plan should be improved. Midsize or small companies might be unable to afford it because of its pricing plans. They usually have a limited budget. Another area of improvement is customer… more »
    Top Answer:It is a perfect solution for our day-to-day work and process management. It is on the cloud. It is in Amazon AWS, but we are currently in the pipeline to get it migrated to Azure. In terms of the… more »
    Top Answer:Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar.
    Top Answer:We use the product to design online courses. It also helps us with media production and marketing.
    Ranking
    16th
    Views
    663
    Comparisons
    407
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,290
    Rating
    8.0
    23rd
    Views
    596
    Comparisons
    390
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Projectplace
    Learn More
    Overview

    Getting work done is easy when your team has the best project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams. Planview ProjectPlace offers a wide range of powerful work and project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams, track progress in real time, and ultimately achieve goals.

    Teamwork is a comprehensive project management and collaboration software that enables teams to work together efficiently and effectively. With its wide range of features and intuitive interface, Teamwork helps streamline workflows, improve communication, and increase productivity.

    One of the key features of Teamwork is its task management capabilities. Users can create tasks, assign them to team members, set due dates, and track progress. This ensures that everyone is on the same page and deadlines are met. Additionally, users can create task dependencies, allowing for better coordination and sequencing of work.

    Teamwork also offers powerful collaboration tools. Users can create and share documents, files, and notes, making it easy for team members to access and collaborate on important information. The software also includes a messaging feature, enabling real-time communication and reducing the need for lengthy email threads.

    Another notable feature of Teamwork is its time-tracking functionality. Users can log their time spent on tasks, providing valuable insights into project progress and resource allocation. This feature is particularly useful for tracking billable hours and ensuring accurate invoicing.

    Teamwork also offers robust project planning and scheduling capabilities. Users can create project timelines, set milestones, and allocate resources. The software provides a visual representation of project progress, allowing teams to easily identify bottlenecks and adjust timelines accordingly.

    Furthermore, Teamwork integrates with a wide range of third-party applications, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and streamlining workflows. The software also offers mobile apps, enabling users to stay connected and productive on the go.

    Sample Customers
    Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Florida Virtual Campus, Amazing.com, 2degrees NZ, Kendrick Content & Consulting
    PayPal, eBay, Disney, Forbes, Microsoft studios, Spotify Vevo, Lenovo, HP, Honda
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company36%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Wholesaler/Distributor9%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization51%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise36%
    Buyer's Guide
    Planview ProjectPlace vs. Teamwork
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Planview ProjectPlace vs. Teamwork and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Planview ProjectPlace is ranked 16th in Project Management Software with 11 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Planview ProjectPlace is rated 8.4, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Planview ProjectPlace writes "You can access the solution anywhere from any part of the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Planview ProjectPlace is most compared with Microsoft Project, Planview Portfolios, Planview PPM Pro, Asana and Jira, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Planview ProjectPlace vs. Teamwork report.

    See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.