Proofpoint Meta [EOL] vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Meta [EOL] and Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In ZTNA as a Service
27th
out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
83
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Meta NaaS
Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate
Learn More
Overview

As applications move to the cloud and workers are increasingly mobile, enterprises need a better alternative for access than traditional VPN. Proofpoint Meta leverages a software-defined perimeter for cloud-delivered secure remote access to resources in the datacenter and the cloud.

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), revolutionizes remote access security for enterprise applications. By replacing traditional VPNs with secure, temporary connections solely to required applications, it significantly reduces the attack surface, mitigating the risk of data breaches. Whether accessing cloud-based or on-premises applications, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) ensures robust security through continuous authentication and authorization, adhering to the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify." This solution not only enhances security by reducing unauthorized access but also simplifies access for users while offering scalability and cost savings by eliminating the need for complex hardware and software. Tailored for organizations with remote workforces, cloud-based applications, and stringent data security concerns, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) stands as an efficient and scalable access control solution among its competitors.

Sample Customers
payoneer, allot, via, sapiens, double verify, myheritage, snowball studios, dynamic yield
NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Proofpoint Meta [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ZTNA as a Service while Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is ranked 27th in ZTNA as a Service. Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.