Jamf Connect vs Proofpoint Meta [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jamf Connect and Proofpoint Meta [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's relatively inexpensive."
  • "The pricing model could be improved, especially considering the availability of alternative MDM solutions like Kandji, which offers similar features for free or at a lower cost."
  • "We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices."
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "I rate the cost as three out of ten, with ten being the highest."
  • "Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • More Jamf Connect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Jamf Connect is an identity provider, and once you log in, you will have all the device's access.
    Top Answer:Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive. You have to pay the deployment charges separately, and you have to pay premium support costs if you take it.
    Top Answer:The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    600
    Comparisons
    319
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    497
    Rating
    9.3
    Unranked
    In ZTNA as a Service
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Wandera, Wandera Private Access
    Meta NaaS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Wandera Threat Defense helps businesses ensure a productive workforce, by defending both managed and unmanaged devices against the full spectrum of mobile threats. The solution includes security protections on the device and in the network, allowing for effective and targeted policy actions against even the most sophisticated attacks. Wandera Threat Defense is powered by MI:RIAM, a leading threat intelligence engine that learns in real-time through signals from 425 million sensors around the globe.

    As applications move to the cloud and workers are increasingly mobile, enterprises need a better alternative for access than traditional VPN. Proofpoint Meta leverages a software-defined perimeter for cloud-delivered secure remote access to resources in the datacenter and the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    Mastercard, Deloitte, PayPal, Toshiba, BNP Paribas, EY, Otis, Rollins, Eurostar, Frontier, Sealy, Rolex, VITAS Healthcare
    payoneer, allot, via, sapiens, double verify, myheritage, snowball studios, dynamic yield
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Government5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jamf Connect is ranked 9th in ZTNA as a Service with 10 reviews while Proofpoint Meta [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ZTNA as a Service. Jamf Connect is rated 9.4, while Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Jamf Connect writes "Enhances user convenience by streamlining login processes". On the other hand, Jamf Connect is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Netskope Private Access, whereas Proofpoint Meta [EOL] is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler Private Access.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.