Galvanize IncidentBond vs Proofpoint Threat Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize Logo
49 views|35 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Proofpoint Logo
255 views|205 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and Proofpoint Threat Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response.
To learn more, read our detailed Security Incident Response Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."

More Galvanize IncidentBond Pros →

"Support is very responsive.""It has reduced our manual efforts to remove emails from each user's inbox, and in this case we do not have to ask our IT department or users to do so.""The best part of Proofpoint Threat Response is the Auto-Pull feature. Being able to pull an email back from a user's mailbox is very useful, yet I have noticed that not a lot of organizations use this kind of feature."

More Proofpoint Threat Response Pros →

Cons
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."

More Galvanize IncidentBond Cons →

"Has some quirks.""If the reporting gets improved then it would be better, but the product is running amazing as it is.""The interface within Threat Response could be made simpler."

More Proofpoint Threat Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's quite affordable to have it with this much functionality and ease to administrate."
  • "The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as Abnormal Security can be much more expensive than Proofpoint Threat Response."
  • More Proofpoint Threat Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The best part of Proofpoint Threat Response is the Auto-Pull feature. Being able to pull an email back from a user's mailbox is very useful, yet I have noticed that not a lot of organizations use this… more »
    Top Answer:The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as… more »
    Top Answer:The interface within Threat Response could be made simpler. To give a specific example, let's say you have uploaded the details of a malicious email to Threat Response in order to pull all the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    49
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    255
    Comparisons
    205
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,473
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IncidentBond, Rsam SIRP, Rsam Incident Management, Rsam Security Incident Response Platform
    Learn More
    Galvanize
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Rsam’s Security Incident Response Platform (SIRP) simplifies and speeds monitoring and resolution. Our dynamic workflow can replicate any existing incident management process and allows you to make changes as your processes evolve - all from a single interface. Track the lifecycle of a security incident and coordinate actions quickly and with ease. 

    No defense can stop every attack. When something does get through, Proofpoint Threat Response takes the manual labor and guesswork out of incident response to help you resolve threats faster and more efficiently. Get an actionable view of threats, enrich alerts, and automate forensic collection and comparison. For verified threats, quarantine and contain users, hosts, and malicious email attachments - automatically or at the push of a button.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    University of Waterloo, Akorn, Fenwick and West LLP
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while Proofpoint Threat Response is ranked 5th in Security Incident Response with 3 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while Proofpoint Threat Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Threat Response writes "Tracks and mitigates email security incidents with Auto-Pull, and has good stability and performance". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas Proofpoint Threat Response is most compared with ServiceNow Security Operations and Cofense Triage.

    See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.

    We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.