• Home
  • PROPRICER vs. Qorus Proposal and RFP Management

PROPRICER vs Qorus Proposal and RFP Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
4th
out of 11 in Proposal Management
Views
118
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 11 in Proposal Management
Views
41
Comparisons
34
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Qorus Proposal, RFP & Bid Management
Learn More
Executive Business Services Inc.
Qorus Software
Overview

PROPRICER is a suite of industry leading proposal pricing tools used by more than 400 government contractors and agencies worldwide. PROPRICER continues to be an unparalleled solution for developing, submitting, analyzing, and revising cost proposals. Our software supports estimating and pricing teams, government cost analysts and managers during the entire acquisition cycle. PROPRICER software replaces homegrown and excel-based pricing tools with a centralized database-driven solution.

Qorus for proposals & RFPs improve quality and reduce time when creating proposals and responding to RFPs with our easy-to-use software.

Sample Customers
Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Leidos, General Atomics, L3Harris, BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton, General Dynamics, CAE USA, Honeywell, Oshkosh Defense, Raytheon, Boeing
Hitachi, Genetec, Kramer Levin, Claranet, Long View, Sanlam

PROPRICER is ranked 4th in Proposal Management while Qorus Proposal and RFP Management is ranked 5th in Proposal Management. PROPRICER is rated 0.0, while Qorus Proposal and RFP Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, PROPRICER is most compared with , whereas Qorus Proposal and RFP Management is most compared with .

See our list of best Proposal Management vendors.

We monitor all Proposal Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.