Compare PTC Integrity vs. TFS

PTC Integrity is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review while TFS is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 8 reviews. PTC Integrity is rated 5.0, while TFS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Facilitates team collaboration and integrates well with other tools". PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS, whereas TFS is most compared with JIRA, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Micro Focus ALM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Integrity Logo
1,817 views|1,382 comparisons
TFS Logo
Read 8 TFS reviews.
27,761 views|23,335 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.

Read more »

This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile.I like the build management features and the integration with Jenkins and many other tools.I like the Kanban board. It is very useful in terms of seeing who is working on what and what the current status of work is.It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code.From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc.The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field.It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.

Read more »

Cons
To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.

Read more »

The test management interface is not very handy.One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management.In the next release, I would like them to include integration for various projects, similar to what JIRA has, and they could create this feature on the dashboard.The dashboard needs more enhancements.More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively.Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization.We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,817
Comparisons
1,382
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
686
Avg. Rating
5.0
Views
27,761
Comparisons
23,335
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
275
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
MKSTeam Foundation Server
Learn
PTC
Microsoft
Overview
The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
Offer
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
TRW AutomotiveVendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Software R&D Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Retailer9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise66%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise87%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email