Compare Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager vs. SANGFOR Application Delivery

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
516
Comparisons
369
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
399
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
141
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SANGFOR AD
Learn
Pulse Secure
Sangfor
Overview

Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

SANGFOR's Application Delivery (AD) solution, a major update of the traditional load balancing product, integrates the server, link, data center's load balancing and application performance optimization functions, which is the best choice for building a highly reliable and efficient service architecture.

Offer
Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Learn more about SANGFOR Application Delivery
Sample Customers
AlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper NetworksChina Construction Bank (CCB), China Telecom
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 11th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review while SANGFOR Application Delivery is ranked 20th in Application Delivery Controllers. Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 9.0, while SANGFOR Application Delivery is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with HAProxy, Citrix ADC, NGINX Plus, F5 BIG-IP and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas SANGFOR Application Delivery is most compared with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.